- Membership & Community
-
Publications & News
- Physiology Journals
-
Newsroom
-
The Physiologist Magazine
- 2019
- 2020
- 2021
- 2022
- 2023
- 2024
-
In Depth
- In Depth—The Bear Necessities
- In Depth: Understanding Circadian Rhythms
- In Depth: Understanding Data
- In Depth: Exercise Physiology: Take Your Medicine at the Gym
- In Depth: Neurodegenerative Disorders
- Imaging Methods Unveil the Invisible
- Rewiring the Brain: Breakthroughs in Neural Therapy
- What’s Coming Next for GLP-1 and Metabolic Disease Treatment
- Understanding the Effects of Maternal Exercise
- How Muscles May Hold Cues to Better Sleep
- The Science Behind Breathwork and Mental Health
- How Science is Reframing Aging and Disease
- How Exercise Supports Brain Health Across the Lifespan
-
Mentoring Forum
- Net Worth
- Take Care
- You … In Charge
- Work. It. Out.
- Working Off-site
- Location, Location, Location?
- Student Support
- Progressing to Postdoc
- Relationship Building
- Let’s Get It Started
- What Do We Value?
- It’s a Postdoc Life
- Coronavirus Contributions
- Creative Communications
- Selection Process
- Conference Connections
- Postdoc Appreciation
- Research Rewards
- Focus on Teaching
- Industry Insights
- Balance Beam
- Post Postdoc
- If You Build It
- Talk It Through
- Forward Bound
- I’ve Earned My PhD. Now What?
- University Life
- Tips for Trainees
- Time Travel
- Prepare Now for the Career You Want
- Landing a Postdoctoral Researcher Position
- Becoming a Physician-Scientist
- Mastering the Art of Science Communication
- Setting Yourself Up for Success in the Lab
- From Postdoc to Professor: Key Strategies for Success
- How to Stay Motivated in Challenging Times
- Staying Motivated Throughout Your Science Career
- Managing Stress and Workload During Your PhD
- Stay Passionate About Your Physiology Career
- Advice for Science Trainees in Uncertain Times
- What Career Success Looks Like for Scientists Today
-
Policy IQ
- Policy IQ—2023 in Review: How APS Advocated on Behalf of Physiologists
- Policy IQ—Supporting Equitable Research
- NIH's Road Map to a Better Postdoc Experience
- The Career Path to Science Advocacy
- Culture of Safety: Stopping Sexual Misconduct
- Physiologists Return to Capitol Hill
- Tips for Scientists to Communicate about Animal Research
- Science Advocacy in a New Political Landscape
- Tips for Making the Call to Congress
- Science Spending Is an Investment
- Advocacy Up Close and Personal
- How Animal Research Advances Physiology and Medicine
- 5 Ways Physiologists Advocated for Science in a Challenging Year
- How Federal Grantmaking Is Reshaping Research Funding
-
Publish with Polish
- Publish with Polish
- The Layers of Open Science
- Take Your Content From Meeting to Manuscript
- APS Journals to Highlight Women’s Health Research
- What Subscribe to Open Means for APS Members
- The 5 Pillars of Publish with Purpose
- 3 Types of Metadata Researchers Should Know About
- Navigating Open Access and New Licensing Options
- Journal Manuscript Prep Made Easy
- How to Navigate Public Access Requirements
- Ensuring Public Trust in Publishing
- Improve Your Scientific Figures With APS and BioRender
- How APS Subscribe to Open Supports Accessible Research
- Meet APS Publications at the Summit
-
Under the Microscope
- Equine Inspiration
- Inquiring Minds
- The Power of Teaching
- The Love of Physiology
- Understanding Women's Physiology Across the Lifespan
- Studying Human Health in Extreme Environments
- Advancing Kidney Health and Physiology Research
- How Gut Microbes Shape Blood Pressure and Drug Response
- Battling Malaria
- Exploring the Microbiome
- From Physics to Physiology: A Scientist's Unconventional Journey
- Finding Meaning in Exercise Physiology and Healthy Aging
- From Classroom Curiosity to Scientific Discovery
- Mentoring Q&A
- Evolution
- Baseline by Scott Steen, CAE, FASAE
- 2025
- 2026
- Find Us on Social Media
-
The Physiologist Magazine
-
Professional Development
-
Meetings & Events
-
American Physiology Summit
- #APS2024 Overview
- Abstracts
- Awards at the Summit
- Award Lectures
- Career Networking Lunch Form
- Dates and Deadlines
- Hotel Information
- International Travel Information for Summit Attendees
- Industry Partners
- Mobile App
- Physical Poster Information
- American Physiology Summit PhysioHub
- Pre-Summit Events
- Registration
- Section & Group Banquet Tickets
- Social Events
- Speaker Audiovisual Instructions
- Summit FAQs
- Travel & Transportation
- Undergraduate Program Book
- Liability Waiver
- Joseph Erlanger: Pioneering Nerve Research and APS Leadership
- Scientific Integrity Policy
- Exhibitor Registration Form
- Keynote Speaker Tracy L. Bale, PhD
- Keynote Speaker Jennifer Lippincott-Schwartz, PhD
- Career Day Workshop: Own Your Path, Positioning for the Career That Fits You
- Summit Status and Safety Update
- From Concept to Classroom
- Control of Renal Function in Health and Disease
- Comparative Physiology Conference
- Signals and Systems: Interorgan Communication in Health and Disease Conference
- Webinars
- Future APS Conferences
- Conference Policies
-
American Physiology Summit
- APS Awards
-
Career & Professional Development
-
Career Gateway
-
Resources
- Transcript—Leading Through Conflict and Difficult Conversations
- Transcript—Managing Conflict with Colleagues
- Transcript—Leading a Team Through Conflict
- Transcript—Providing Difficult Feedback
- Transcript—Team Dynamics and Culture Primer
- Transcript—Building a Team
- Transcript—Leading a Team Assigned to You
- Transcript—Creating a Team Culture
-
Resources
- Career Navigator
- Center for Physiology Education
- Virtual Courses
- Physiology Job Board
- APS Graduate Physiology & Biomedical Science Catalog
-
Career Gateway
-
Meetings & Events
-
Advocacy & Resources
- Science Policy
-
Resources
- Researcher Resources
- Educator Resources
- Trainee Resources
- Student Resources
-
APS Graduate Physiology & Biomedical Science Catalog
- Des Moines University
- George Washington University
- New York Medical College
- Pennsylvania State University
- Texas A&M University
- Texas A&M University Medical Physiology
- University of Alabama at Birmingham
- University at Buffalo
- University of Colorado
- University of Michigan
- University of Minnesota
- University of Missouri-Pathobiology and Integrative Biomedical Sciences
- University of Nebraska Medical Center
- University of Nevada, Reno
- University of South Carolina School of Medicine
- University of Tennessee Health Science Center (UTHSC)
- University of Texas Health Science Center
- Virginia Commonwealth University
- Wayne State University
- Physiology Department Catalog Submission Form
- Boston University
- Career Gateway
- Major Initiatives
- About APS
Testimony from the American Physiological Society on the FY 2026 budget of the National Institutes of Health, prepared for the Subcommittee on Labor, Health and Human Services, and Education, and Related Agencies.
The American Physiological Society (APS) writes to express its strong support of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and urges the Subcommittee to fully fund the agency at $51.3 billion for fiscal year (FY) 2026, to ensure that its funds are used to advance science, and to oppose reckless restructuring of the agency. Thanks to consistent investment through congressionally appropriated funds, the NIH has driven U.S. leadership in biomedical research and innovation for decades, fueling economic growth and delivering life-saving cures. However, recent actions taken by NIH have resulted in withholding of appropriated funds and abrupt cancellation of grants, shaking the confidence the scientific community has placed in the agency. The deep cuts proposed in the President’s budget would dismantle American scientific leadership and cause damage to the nation’s scientific ecosystem that would take years to rebuild.
Fully fund the NIH at $51.3 billion for FY 2026
Investments at NIH drive economic growth and provide jobs in all 50 states. It is estimated that each dollar spent at NIH drives $2.56 of economic activity, and in FY 2024 the NIH supported over 400,000 jobs across the country.[1] Cutting the agency’s budget by 40%, as proposed in the President’s FY 2026 budget request, would cause massive job losses in every state.[2] Furthermore, the absence of new funding opportunities would shut down the nation’s scientific training pipeline and cause many highly trained researchers and medical experts to seek jobs in other countries. The loss of STEM talent would dampen private industry’s willingness to invest[3],[4] and exacerbate existing talent shortages in government.
While other countries, including China, continue to ramp up investments in research, U.S. scientific leadership grows more precarious. The next generation of scientists is already at risk. Scientific training programs have begun to cut back on the number of student positions offered, and many early-career researchers are considering other fields. Only by maintaining robust funding for NIH can the U.S. keep its competitive edge in medical innovation and retain the expertise needed to tackle public health challenges.
Ensure that grant funds are available to researchers
In recent months, researchers across the country have found themselves unable to access the funds they need to conduct research and pay salaries. More than 1,300 grants have been abruptly cancelled since February, including research on diseases such as Alzheimer’s and cancer, and payments have failed to be distributed on time for at least 1,000 additional grants.[5] NIH policy on indirect costs has threatened to cut billions in funding necessary for maintaining facilities and equipment.[6] These funding uncertainties directly impact research timelines and hiring decisions, and inconsistent communication has left researchers uncertain how to navigate funding issues.
Research projects take a long time to plan and execute, and even short-term disruptions can set research back by years. While cuts and delays to research funding have been justified as preventing wasteful spending and promoting government efficiency, the effect is the opposite. A brief pause in a project might mean that new clinical samples need to be collected and processed, expired reagents need to be re-purchased, and incomplete experiments need to be completely restarted. If new staff are needed, it may take months to train them to perform highly technical protocols. Researchers rely on consistent and predictable grant funding to make long-term strategic decisions in the lab that minimize wasted time and materials.
Oppose reckless restructuring without transparency
The FY 2026 U.S. Health and Human Services (HHS) budget request has proposed a radical restructuring of the NIH that would reduce its 27 institutes and centers (ICs) to just 8. This proposal was developed without input from the research community and with no transparency to its methodology. The barebones outlines in the FY 2026 Congressional Justification provides scant rationale for the restructuring plan and fails to estimate the costs or even the potential benefits to organizational efficiency. Any significant change to an organization the size and scope of NIH runs the risk of major disruptions as staff are moved and re-trained. The magnitude of the proposed changes could paralyze the agency and cause U.S. biomedical science to grind to a halt.
The scientific community is not opposed to considering updates and refinements to NIH operations, such as those that would improve grant management or reduce administrative burden for grantees. Sen. Cassidy recently worked with the community to identify policies to address the agency’s shortcomings,[7] and APS offered several recommendations.[8] We encourage Congress to continue an open dialogue with researchers and to oppose the reorganization of NIH without transparency and without stakeholder input.
APS strongly urges Congress to take swift action to bolster the NIH. Every further disruption to funding, whether through grant cancellations, administrative delays, or impoundment of funds, represents a delay to a cure and diminishes the economy. Congress should protect the bipartisan investment in biomedical research it has built over decades by fully funding the NIH, ensuring that its grant money is appropriately disbursed to researchers, and rejecting restructuring plans developed without transparency.
Founded in 1887, APS is home to more than 8,300 members and 80,000 authors. These researchers work in universities and hospitals advancing research and patient care, government agencies supporting public health and safety, and private industry developing new treatments. We believe in science—and the researchers working across all 50 states whose innovations lead to discoveries that shape a healthier, brighter future for all Americans.
[1] https://www.unitedformedicalresearch.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/UMR_NIH-Role-in-Sustaining-US-Economy-FY2024-2025-Update.pdf
[3] https://yaledailynews.com/blog/2025/02/12/analysis-nih-funding-cuts-threaten-biotech-innovation-and-economy/